
U405 Reconnectable Breakaway
The U405 is a dry reconnectable breakaway for the conventional dispensing market. It is designed to be installed on fuel dispensing hoses, and will separate when subjected to a designated pull force. The dual valves seat automatically stopping the flow of fuel and limiting any fuel spillage, while protecting the dispensing equipment. When reconnecting the separated halves, the U405 seals tightly on an O-ring before the poppet stems engage to open the valve. For proper operation on high-hanging hoses, the U405 must always be installed With a straightening hose with a minimum length of 9". For low hose applications, the U405 should be installed down stream of the retractor cable.
WARNING
We advice you replace a new U405 breakaway when the pull-force is lower than 180 lbs after many reconnections
Materials:
Body: die cast zinc
Main Seals: Viton
Main Spring: stainless steel
Guide and poppet: POM
Protective Sleeve: Pa66
Features:
Pull force- the U405 will break away with a pull force of 250 lbs 5%, the U405 will break away with a pull force of 300 lbs 5%.
Unique double-poppet design-features low pressure drop.
Flow rate: 0-60L/Min
Working pressure: 0.18Mpa
Coupling halves- protected by proven plastic sleeves
Easily reconnected- just "push and twist" until you hear the audible click, signifying the unit has been correctly reconnected. Reconnection force approximately 15 lbs.
Line shock - U405 is able to absorb the effects of normal line shock through the unique design of the disconnecting features.
May be reconnected under wet or dry hose conditions.
100% Factory Tested.
Package:
Product ID Net Weight Cross Weight
U405-A 26.5kg/case of 50
30kg/case of 50
35x35x26 cm3 /case of 50
U405-B 26.5kg/case of 50 30kg/case of 50
35x35x26 cm3 /case of 50
U405-C 26.5kg/case of 50 30kg/case of 50
35x35x26 cm3 /case of 50
U405-D 26.5kg/case of 50 30kg/case of 50
35x35x26 cm3 /case of 50
we are committed to create the best workplace, encourage our staffs to put their own personalities into their jobs, and provide them a stage to show themselves.
Today there are
nine. To that extent the NPT and other arms-control measures have been successful, yet the treaty is
being eroded rapidly. Now that the physics of nuclear weapons is well understood, and precision
technology is more readily available, countries can more easily set up a nuclear programme. Around 40
have the ability, in theory, to develop nuclear weapons.
Und fuel dispenser er the NPT, the declared nuclear-weapon states—the United States, the Soviet Union (now Russia),
China, Britain and France—promised to reduce and eventually eliminate their nuclear stockpiles. In
return, the rest of the world pledged to use nuclear technology only for peaceful purposes. But the treaty
left gaps. Countries such as Israel, India and Pakistan did not sign it, and have been free to develop
nuclear weapons. The inspection system to stop cheating by signatories has also proved faulty. The
International Atomic Energy Agency did not detect Saddam Hussein s illicit nuclear programme in the
1980s. A system of more intrusive inspections has been created, but countries are under no obligation to
subscribe to it.
Inspections are vital, since the NPT allows countries to come close to having an actual bomb. Japan
already has a large stock of plutonium from its civil nuclear programme, and could probably develop a
bomb within months. In Iran s case, full mastery of the technology to enrich uranium to make nuclear
fuel in power stations would give it the ability to produce fissile material for atomic bombs.
Many countries have resisted pressure from America and others to accept further restrictions on their
nuclear facilities, accusing the nuclear powers of failing to make progress on disarmament. Besides,
American policy can seem self-defeating. The United States has lifted financial sanctions imposed on
fuel dispenser India and Pakistan after they tested nuclear weapons in 1998, seeing them as vital allies. Earlier this
year the Bush administration signed a co-operation d fuel dispenser eal with India which, if approved by Congress,
would le